July 16, 2009

Where we differ

squashed:

jeffmiller:

You and Squashed think you are being compassionate toward the guy who wants to sell his kidney, but it’s not compassion—it’s cruelty. He has a potential path out of poverty, and you want to block it. If you think it’s an awful path, give him a better one, so that the kidney sale looks less attractive.

Jeff, I assure you, I am trying very hard to give that guy a path out of poverty that doesn’t require him to sell chunks of his body. I have all sorts of ideas for programs that would have a much, much better chance of succeeding than a one-shot cash injection followed by a probable lifetime of health consequences.

The bold part is the point i’ve been wanting to make but Squashed beat me to. This whole “selling your organs” thing just sounds like a fancier pay day loan scheme, except instead of a crippling spiral of never-ending debt, you just have to go through the rest of your life down a kidney or with half a liver and all of the problems that come of that. What was the problem with changing the donor rules to being opt-out instead of opt-in, again? That just seems like a much simpler solution to the problem of organ donation, one that doesn’t involve more complicated regulation and oversight or the specter of organ harvesting.

Comments (View)
blog comments powered by Disqus